You posted it in the Debate echo. I returned it here.
Debate Echo msg 1620 on Docsplace, Sept 3, 2013.
You are talking about a post that appeared in your echo on
9/3/2013, at 11:24 AM. I posted it in THIS echo on
9/2/2013, at 7:23 PM (#4997).
Which leads to a somewhat obvious question: how dumb ARE
How did it wind up in the Debate echo?
That was not a ruling. That was advice to Richardson.
It was your official interpretation of the rule, and it
makes the rule moot.
No, it was not. There is no rule against anyone reading the
echo, that was advice to stop doing so.
As usual, you pretend to miss the point. You ruled that if
anyone feels they are being provoked in your echo they
should react by not reading the provocation. That makes
Peter's provocation rule moot, just as it makes the rule
about personal attacks moot. This was already explained
more thoroughly. You just ignored it. Nothing new.
|Location:||Huntington Beach, CA.|
|Nodes:||8 (0 / 8)|