1. Forum
  2. DOVE-Net
  3. Synchronet Sysops

  • qnet-http

    From Trikester@VERT/DOVEMOD/BSMNTQQ to All on Fri Dec 3 21:12:55 2021
    Hi,

    I am curious if qnet-http has any known upload/push issue?

    I'd set my QWK hub call-out command to use qnet-http -s %s site pw and while it connected fine and retrieved .qwk packets, the QNET event would only ever update the REP packet, but not actually post/upload it. No errors in the log to suggest it was even thinking about posting/uploading.

    Switching to qnet-ftp and it uploaded without issue.

    I ask as the wiki suggests that it's a drop-in replacement for qnet-ftp, and it's nice to have the encryption on it.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ... The Basement ... Not really open yet.
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Trikester on Fri Dec 3 22:56:19 2021
    Re: qnet-http
    By: Trikester to All on Fri Dec 03 2021 01:12 pm

    Hi,

    I am curious if qnet-http has any known upload/push issue?

    Yes, it has known issue. It's not recommended that you use it as this time.

    I'd set my QWK hub call-out command to use qnet-http -s %s site pw and while it connected fine and retrieved .qwk packets, the QNET event would only ever update the REP packet, but not actually post/upload it. No errors in the log to suggest it was even thinking about posting/uploading.

    Switching to qnet-ftp and it uploaded without issue.

    I ask as the wiki suggests that it's a drop-in replacement for qnet-ftp, and it's nice to have the encryption on it.

    The issues may be on the server side (web/root/qwk.ssjs), but I'm not sure yet. It hasn't been a priority to root-cause and fix.
    --
    digital man (rob)

    This Is Spinal Tap quote #36:
    Bobbi Flekman: Money talks, and bullshit walks.
    Norco, CA WX: 66.3øF, 58.0% humidity, 2 mph E wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Trikester@VERT/DOVEMOD/BSMNTQQ to Digital Man on Sat Dec 4 05:12:37 2021
    Re: qnet-http
    By: Digital Man to Trikester on Fri Dec 03 2021 02:56 pm

    Yes, it has known issue. It's not recommended that you use it as this time. The issues may be on the server side (web/root/qwk.ssjs), but I'm not sure yet. It hasn't been a priority to root-cause and fix.
    OK, fair enough - I did a search for an issue but didn't find one. Should I get one filed or does it not matter too much since it's known?

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ... The Basement ... Not really open yet.
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Trikester on Sat Dec 4 21:16:32 2021
    Re: qnet-http
    By: Trikester to Digital Man on Fri Dec 03 2021 09:12 pm

    Re: qnet-http
    By: Digital Man to Trikester on Fri Dec 03 2021 02:56 pm

    Yes, it has known issue. It's not recommended that you use it as this time. The issues may be on the server side (web/root/qwk.ssjs), but I'm not sure yet. It hasn't been a priority to root-cause and fix.
    OK, fair enough - I did a search for an issue but didn't find one. Should I get one filed or does it not matter too much since it's known?

    Yes, please file an issue.
    --
    digital man (rob)

    This Is Spinal Tap quote #8:
    Derek Smalls: Making a big thing out of it would have been a good idea.
    Norco, CA WX: 57.8øF, 90.0% humidity, 0 mph SW wind, 0.01 inches rain/24hrs
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Trikester@VERT/DOVEMOD/BSMNTQQ to Digital Man on Sun Dec 5 17:56:59 2021
    Re: qnet-http
    By: Digital Man to Trikester on Sat Dec 04 2021 01:16 pm

    Yes, please file an issue.

    Done!

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ... The Basement ... Not really open yet.