This is my ini file for bullshit:
messageBase = BULLSHIT
maxMessages = 0
[colors]
title = LIGHTRED
text = LIGHTGREEN
heading = DARKGRAY
lightbarForeground = WHITE
lightbarBackground = BG_RED
listForeground = WHITE
footer = WHITE
border = LIGHTBLUE,CYAN,LIGHTCYAN,LIGHTGRAY,WHITE
This is my message base for bullshit in scfg
[Bulletins Sub-board]
1: Long Name Bulletins
2: Short Name Bulletins
3: QWK Name BULLSHIT
4: Internal Code BULLSHIT
5: Newsgroup Name
6: Access Requirements LEVEL 90
7: Reading Requirements LEVEL 90
8: Posting Requirements LEVEL 90
9: Operator Requirements
10: Moderated Posting User
11: Maximum Messages Unlimited
12: Purge by Age Disabled
13: Duplicate Checking Disabled
14: Toggle Options...
15: Network Options...
16: Advanced Options...
The message I posed in Bulletins does not show up in BULLSHIT
What have I done wrong?
This is my ini file for bullshit:
messageBase = BULLSHIT
maxMessages = 0
[colors]
title = LIGHTRED
text = LIGHTGREEN
heading = DARKGRAY
lightbarForeground = WHITE
lightbarBackground = BG_RED
listForeground = WHITE
footer = WHITE
border = LIGHTBLUE,CYAN,LIGHTCYAN,LIGHTGRAY,WHITE
This is my message base for bullshit in scfg
[Bulletins Sub-board]
1: Long Name Bulletins
2: Short Name Bulletins
3: QWK Name BULLSHIT
4: Internal Code BULLSHIT
5: Newsgroup Name
6: Access Requirements LEVEL 90
7: Reading Requirements LEVEL 90
8: Posting Requirements LEVEL 90
9: Operator Requirements
10: Moderated Posting User
11: Maximum Messages Unlimited
12: Purge by Age Disabled
13: Duplicate Checking Disabled
14: Toggle Options...
15: Network Options...
16: Advanced Options...
The message I posed in Bulletins does not show up in BULLSHIT
What have I done wrong?
Have you tried setting the "Reading Requirements" lower? Setting it to "Level
90" means only sysops can *read* the messages in that sub.
The message I posed in Bulletins does not show up in BULLSHIT
What have I done wrong?
Have you tried setting the "Reading Requirements" lower? Setting it to "Level
90" means only sysops can *read* the messages in that sub.
I'll do that
But I logged in as Sysop and still didn't see it
Re: Bullshit
By: RUBEN FIGUEROA to echicken on Sat Oct 10 2020 16:17:58
Not sure. Your setup looks okay; I'll take a closer look at it later. Could be a bug somewhere.
---
echicken
electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
■ Synchronet ■ electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
Is it BULLS HIT or really BULLSHIT? I usually censor my swearing but this is
for clarification purposes.
Re: Bullshit
By: The Millionaire to echicken on Sun Oct 11 2020 13:25:51
It's "Bullshit".
---
echicken
electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
■ Synchronet ■ electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
Is the “F” word next for a program or game? I’m surprised that DM would allow a swear word for a program.
Re: Bullshit
By: The Millionaire to echicken on Mon Oct 12 2020 01:48 pm
Is the "F" word next for a program or game? I'm surprised that DM
would allow a swear word for a program.
It's okay to lighten up about that sometimes. It's a joke about the word "bulletin".
Is the "F" word next for a program or game? I'm surprised that DM would
Is the "F" word next for a program or game? I'm surprised that DM
would
Yes. I'm rebranding all of my games: Fucking Lemons, Fucking Star Trek, That Fucking Jeopardy Game, Gooble Fucking Gooble, Deliver some Fucking Chicken, and so forth. I might even call webv4 "the fucking web interface" since that will make discussions about it a bit more honest by default.
Legend of the Fucking Red Dragon
On 10-12-20 22:28, echicken wrote to The Millionaire <=-
I'm sorry that "Bullshit" offends you, but IMHO it barely counts as a swear - which makes it perfect as a slightly cheeky name for a BULLetin program which can be used instead of BULLSeye.
Re: Bullshit
By: The Millionaire to echicken on Mon Oct 12 2020 13:48:47
Is the "F" word next for a program or game? I'm surprised that DM would
Yes. I'm rebranding all of my games: Fucking Lemons, Fucking Star Trek, That Fucking Jeopardy Game, Gooble Fucking Gooble, Deliver some Fucking Chicken, and so forth. I might even call webv4 "the fucking web interface" since that will make discussions about it a bit more honest by default.
---
echicken
On 10-12-20 22:28, echicken wrote to The Millionaire <=-
I'm sorry that "Bullshit" offends you, but IMHO it barely counts as a swear - which makes it perfect as a slightly cheeky name for a BULLetin program which can be used instead of BULLSeye.
Here in Australia, "bullshit" is part of everyday language. :D
echicken wrote to Nightfox <=-
Legend of the Fucking Red Dragon
I was thinking of an IGM framework for LotRFD, the Fast Upstart
Code Kit, so that Baja devs won't have to waste so much time
rewriting what is essentially boilerplate IGM code. Of course for
that to work properly it would have to be built upon a Basic
Underlying Translation Table. But then this would allow for
Primarily Object Oriented Programs to run on top of the code kit,
and a Non Object Oriented Data Layer Engine to operate on top of
that (for inter-BBS communication).
So the stack I have in mind is something like: Basic Underlying Translation Table -> Fast Upstart Code Kit -> Primarily Object
Oriented Program -> Non Object Oriented Data Layer Engine. Of
course, once you put all of that together there's an obvious need
to, uh, flush the buffer once in a while, and that brings up a
host of other problems.
Nightfox wrote to echicken <=-
Is the "F" word next for a program or game? I'm surprised that DM
would
Yes. I'm rebranding all of my games: Fucking Lemons, Fucking Star Trek, That Fucking Jeopardy Game, Gooble Fucking Gooble, Deliver some Fucking Chicken, and so forth. I might even call webv4 "the fucking web interface" since that will make discussions about it a bit more honest by default.
Legend of the Fucking Red Dragon
Yes. I'm rebranding all of my games: Fucking Lemons, Fucking Star
Trek, That Fucking Jeopardy Game, Gooble Fucking Gooble, Deliver
some Fucking Chicken, and so forth. I might even call webv4 "the
fucking web interface" since that will make discussions about it a
bit more honest by default.
Legend of the Fucking Red Dragon
Here in Australia, "bullshit" is part of everyday language. :D
I was thinking of an IGM framework for LotRFD, the Fast Upstart Code Kit, so that Baja devs won't have to waste so much time rewriting what is essentially boilerplate IGM code. Of course for that to work properly it would have to be built upon a Basic Underlying Translation Table. But then this would allow for Primarily Object Oriented Programs to run on top of the code kit, and a Non Object Oriented Data Layer Engine to operate on top of that (for inter-BBS communication).
So the stack I have in mind is something like: Basic Underlying Translation Table -> Fast Upstart Code Kit -> Primarily Object Oriented Program -> Non Object Oriented Data Layer Engine. Of course, once you put all of that together there's an obvious need to, uh, flush the buffer once in a while, and that brings up a host of other problems.
Re: Bullshit
By: echicken to Nightfox on Tue Oct 13 2020 01:59 am
I was thinking of an IGM framework for LotRFD, the Fast Upstart Code Kit, so that Baja devs won't have to waste so much time rewriting what is essentially boilerplate IGM code. Of course for that to work properly it would have to be built upon a Basic Underlying Translation Table. But then this would allow for Primarily Object Oriented Programs to run on top of the code kit, and a Non Object Oriented Data Layer Engine to operate on top of that (for inter-BBS communication).
So the stack I have in mind is something like: Basic Underlying Translation Table -> Fast Upstart Code Kit -> Primarily Object Oriented Program -> Non Object Oriented Data Layer Engine. Of course, once you put all of that together there's an obvious need to, uh, flush the buffer once in a while, and that brings up a host of other problems.
All of that might require Favorably Unlimited Compiler Knowledge.
Nightfox
It all sounds like Sepefolous Hierarchical Integration Topography to me.
~Mortifis
---
■ Synchronet ■ The Realm of Dispair telnet ephram.synchro.net 2323 ssh 2222 web 82
Yes. I'm rebranding all of my games: Fucking Lemons, Fucking Star Trek, That Fucking Jeopardy Game, Gooble Fucking Gooble, Deliver some
Is the "F" word next for a program or game? I'm surprised that DM
would
Yes. I'm rebranding all of my games: Fucking Lemons, Fucking Star Trek, That Fucking Jeopardy Game, Gooble Fucking Gooble, Deliver some Fucking Chicken, and so forth. I might even call webv4 "the fucking web interface" since that will make discussions about it a bit more honest by default.
Legend of the Fucking Red Dragon
I think "Legend of the Red Fucking Dragon" rolls off the tongue a
bit easier. :-)
I'm sorry that "Bullshit" offends you, but IMHO it barely counts as a swear - which makes it perfect as a slightly cheeky name for a BULLetin program which can be used instead of BULLSeye.
Here in Australia, "bullshit" is part of everyday language. :D
So, you're all just talking bullshit, eh? :-P
Fucking of the Red Dragon
I'm sorry that "Bullshit" offends you, but IMHO it barely counts as a swear - wh ich makes it perfect as a slightly cheeky name for a BULLetin program which can be used instead of BULLSeye.
It's "Bullshit".
I'm sorry that "Bullshit" offends you, but IMHO it barely counts as a swear - wh ich makes it perfect as a slightly cheeky name for a BULLetin program which can be used instead of BULLSeye.
This is bullshit.
Re: Re: Bullshit
By: Gamgee to Nightfox on Tue Oct 13 2020 07:40 am
Is the "F" word next for a program or game? I'm surprised that DM
would
Yes. I'm rebranding all of my games: Fucking Lemons, Fucking Star Trek, That Fucking Jeopardy Game, Gooble Fucking Gooble, Deliver some Fucking Chicken, and so forth. I might even call webv4 "the fucking web interface" since that will make discussions about it a bit more honest by default.
Legend of the Fucking Red Dragon
I think "Legend of the Red Fucking Dragon" rolls off the tongue a
bit easier. :-)
Fucking of the Red Dragon
BlaZ
I saw that, didn't Harry Reems star in it?
---
■ Synchronet ■ The Realm of Dispair telnet ephram.synchro.net 2323 ssh 2222 web 82
Isn't "Bullocks" the same thing? Horseshit? poppycock? pidgeonshit? cockamamy?
Re: Re: Bullshit
By: Android8675 to paulie420 on Wed Oct 14 2020 10:50 am
Isn't "Bullocks" the same thing? Horseshit? poppycock? pidgeonshit? cockamamy?
I think "Bullocks" means balls/testicles.
Re: Re: Bullshit
By: Nightfox to Android8675 on Wed Oct 14 2020 02:47 pm
Yeah, that's what I thought (but didn't have the bullocks to google it).
digital man
Sling Blade quote #13:
Karl: He lives inside of his own heart. That's an awful big place to live in. Norco, CA WX: 93.7°F, 22.0% humidity, 5 mph ENE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
Re: Re: Bullshit
By: Nightfox to Android8675 on Wed Oct 14 2020 02:47 pm
Yeah, that's what I thought (but didn't have the bullocks to google it).
Nope. It means vulgar, rubbish, nonsense, etc.
Yeah, that's what I thought (but didn't have the bullocks to google
it).
Nope. It means vulgar, rubbish, nonsense, etc.
Yeah, that's what I thought (but didn't have the bullocks to google it).
Nope. It means vulgar, rubbish, nonsense, etc.
I was able to do a proof of concept by adding these lines in frame.js
contents = contents.replace('@CLS@', '')
.replace('@CLEAR@', '')
.replace(/(?:@(.+?)@)/g, function(match, rcontents, rinput) {
return bbs.atcode(rcontents);
});
On 10-13-20 08:15, Mortifis wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
On 10-12-20 22:28, echicken wrote to The Millionaire <=-
I'm sorry that "Bullshit" offends you, but IMHO it barely counts as a swear - which makes it perfect as a slightly cheeky name for a BULLetin program which can be used instead of BULLSeye.
Here in Australia, "bullshit" is part of everyday language. :D
So, you're all just talking bullshit, eh? :-P
On 10-13-20 10:09, echicken wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
Re: Re: Bullshit
By: Tony Langdon to echicken on Tue Oct 13 2020 20:20:00
Here in Australia, "bullshit" is part of everyday language. :D
Here also - I assumed it was much the same everywhere. I suspect
somebody is just looking for something to complain about. :)
On 10-13-20 14:06, Mortifis wrote to Nightfox <=-
It all sounds like Sepefolous Hierarchical Integration Topography to
me.
On 10-14-20 16:46, Digital Man wrote to Nightfox <=-
Yeah, that's what I thought (but didn't have the bullocks to google
it).
On 10-14-20 14:47, Nightfox wrote to Android8675 <=-
Re: Re: Bullshit
By: Android8675 to paulie420 on Wed Oct 14 2020 10:50 am
Isn't "Bullocks" the same thing? Horseshit? poppycock? pidgeonshit? cockamamy?
I think "Bullocks" means balls/testicles.
--- DIGITAL MAN wrote ---
I think "Bullocks" means balls/testicles.
Yeah, that's what I thought (but didn't have the bullocks to google it).
digital man
So if you're going to work on this, please keep all of that in mind. If not, it's on my mental to-do list and I'll get to it when I get to it.
From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet
So if you're going to work on this, please keep all of that in mind. If not, it's on my mental to-do list and I'll get to it when I get to it.
echicken, can you review it here and give me your comments, etc.: https://gitlab.com/SynchronetBBS/sbbs/-/merge_requests/1/diffs
Merge requests should be submitted at gitlab.synchro.net, not the mirror at gitlab.com or github.com.
| Sysop: | Chris Crash |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huntington Beach, CA. |
| Users: | 557 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 92:51:15 |
| Calls: | 10,385 |
| Files: | 5 |
| Messages: | 360,684 |