the main thing i don't care for with IPv6 is the loss of NAT
which, granted, is not needed, but it is a way to kind of
protect your devices by keeping them hidden... IPv6 is not
meant to be hidden and every address is meant to be
accessible from everywhere... it is a huge change from IPv4
thinking, really...
Interesting. So there is not such thing as an IPv6 router
with a NAT?
Interesting. So there is not such thing as an IPv6 router
with a NAT?
there is but only for certain uses, AIUI... here are some quick quotes
that may help understanding...
"The end-to-end connectivity problems that are caused by NAT are solved because the number of routes increases with the number of nodes that are connected to the Internet. ... Answers Explanation & Hints: The large number of public IPv6 addresses eliminates the need for NAT."
the above quotes taken from
https://www.google.com/search?q=IPV6+NAT
IPv6 will be a long way off for me. I don't see Luckymobile
supporting it and I don't get any indication that Acanac (my DSL
serivce) is either.
https://www.google.com/search?q=IPV6+NAT
I still think that a NAT that hides internal devices from the
outside world is a good thing.
IPv6 will be a long way off for me. I don't see Luckymobile
supporting it and I don't get any indication that Acanac (my DSL
serivce) is either.
Sysop: | Chris Crash |
---|---|
Location: | Huntington Beach, CA. |
Users: | 584 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 16:11:35 |
Calls: | 10,753 |
Files: | 5 |
Messages: | 450,052 |