Michael Mrak wrote to All <=-
Dear All,
Now the enthusiasm has gripped me :-)
The integration of DOVE-Net was really easy. This has really been implemented in a very foolproof way. Great to find a good base of
groups to share right away.
Now I would like to integrate my BBS as a node in FidoNet.
Getting a node address is no problem, I am already in contact
with the local coordinator. So I know which FidoNet address and
password I will use.
The adaptation of Synchronet (running on Debian) for integration
seems a bit tricky to me. Do you know a good clear source of
information how I can integrate my node address as uncomplicated
as possible?
Dear All,
Now the enthusiasm has gripped me :-)
The integration of DOVE-Net was really easy. This has really been implemented in a very foolproof way. Great to find a good base of groups to share right away.
Now I would like to integrate my BBS as a node in FidoNet. Getting a node address is no problem, I am already in contact with the local coordinator. So I know which FidoNet address and password I will use.
The adaptation of Synchronet (running on Debian) for integration seems a bit tricky to me. Do you know a good clear source of information how I can integrate my node address as uncomplicated as possible?
Now I would like to integrate my BBS as a node in FidoNet. Getting a node address is no problem, I am already in contact with the local coordinator. So I know which FidoNet address and password I will use.
The adaptation of Synchronet (running on Debian) for integration seems a bit tricky to me. Do you know a good clear source of information how I can integrate my node address as uncomplicated as possible?
MRO wrote to Michael Mrak <=-
dovenet requires almost no work to setup. fidonet is a bit more complicated and probably not worth the effort.
you can find someone who will feed you fidonet via nntp and that would
be easy for you.
otherwise lordtime has a decent fidonet guide.
otherwise lordtime has a decent fidonet guide.
I just set up FidoNet mail with echo areas on my SynchronetBBS with very little effort at all. The Bink part was the hardest part to do and even that was prettystraight forward.
MRO wrote to N1uro <=-
years ago, i didnt even know what i was doing and i setup multiple
people on ftn networks with different softwares. and 2 of those people ended up running msg nets and acting like i never showed them how to do it.
i guess they like to pretend they figured it out on their own instead
of mro the asshole going in via vnc or teamviewer and doing it all for them.
years ago, i didnt even know what i was doing and i setup multiple people on ftn networks with different softwares. and 2 of those people ended up running msg nets and acting like i never showed them how to do it.
Things were so much simpler then back in the day weren't they! People had to learn how to use DOS and command lines, programs were much smaller and simpler to use, and still were quite functional (which is why I love the old door games!) Now with everything hidden behind windows GUIs people have
MRO wrote to N1uro <=-
i'm not even talking about the 90s. i'm talking like 2000's
i wouldnt say things are simpler. everything seems the same to me. same shit different day ---
i wouldnt say things are simpler. everything seems the same to me. same shit different day ---
From what I see it's MUCH different now than it was even 20 years ago! Back then, you may get the occasional person who think they surpassed you in their knowledge base and snubbed you aside. That I could easily deal with.
Today after I help others configure my software packages *they* want to run, they accuse me of doing damage to their hardware because another clown who doesn't know what their doing said so without providing any proof of concept to back up their accusations. I almost wish I didn't know now what I do.
So far the configuration for fido mail on SBBS I found to be a lot simpler than originally thought. My problem was I was reading the docs and was
way over processing them in me noggin. I did better without the docs. Proof
MRO wrote to N1uro <=-
see, that reminds of of stuff i've seen since i've been in computing.
you just get the numbers right and it works. if it doesnt work you look
at the logs and you know why. i was scared to hook up to fidonet and other msg nets because it was intimidating to me. once i hopped it i realized there was nothing to it.
those fidonet guys just like to act like they're technical guys and everything they do is hard. it's just not.
N1uro wrote to MRO <=-
Things were so much simpler then back in the day weren't they! People
had to learn how to use DOS and command lines, programs were much
smaller and simpler to use, and still were quite functional (which is
why I love the old door games!) Now with everything hidden behind
windows GUIs people have become point n click lazy.
N1uro wrote to MRO <=-
So far the configuration for fido mail on SBBS I found to be a lot
simpler than originally thought. My problem was I was reading the docs
and was way over processing them in me noggin. I did better without the docs. Proof we're engaged in a thread is the PoC to my statement :)
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to N1uro <=-
Things were so much simpler then back in the day weren't they! People
had to learn how to use DOS and command lines, programs were much
smaller and simpler to use, and still were quite functional (which is
why I love the old door games!) Now with everything hidden behind
windows GUIs people have become point n click lazy.
I remember when I finally got that One Big Batch file running, I
didn't think it was easy by any means. But when I finally had the
mailer answering the phone and handing off the caller to the BBS
at the right speed, timed mail events running correctly, and
maintenance tasks running as errorlevels off of the mailer, I was
pretty happy.
That was quite a nifty system, having the mailer drop out at
different error levels and having your batch file read them to
figure out what to do next.
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to N1uro <=-
I remember when I finally got that One Big Batch file running, I didn't think it was easy by any means. But when I finally had the mailer answering the phone and handing off the caller to the BBS at the right speed, timed mail events running correctly, and maintenance tasks
running as errorlevels off of the mailer, I was pretty happy.
That was quite a nifty system, having the mailer drop out at different error levels and having your batch file read them to figure out what to
do next.
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to N1uro <=-
Getting multiple pieces of software talking to each other usually
hinged on getting the paths right. Now with binkit and tickit rolled
into Synchronet, I've got all of the moving parts that used to be third-party packages all integrated into Synchronet.
Gamgee wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
I agree! My One Big Batch file was one of my proudest accomplishments back in those days (early 90's). To get all those things to talk and interact properly was not easy, and it was all under MSDOS! I still
have that batch file safely saved away, and every now and then take it
out for a look, and pat myself on the back. ;-)
Gamgee wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
I agree! My One Big Batch file was one of my proudest accomplishments back in those days (early 90's). To get all those things to talk and interact properly was not easy, and it was all under MSDOS! I still
have that batch file safely saved away, and every now and then take it
out for a look, and pat myself on the back. ;-)
What is interesting is that I have a backup of my Fido message bases from 1996 in there. Busy place, it was.
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Gamgee <=-
I agree! My One Big Batch file was one of my proudest accomplishments back in those days (early 90's). To get all those things to talk and interact properly was not easy, and it was all under MSDOS! I still
have that batch file safely saved away, and every now and then take it
out for a look, and pat myself on the back. ;-)
I keep a copy of my old DOS BBS around with the thought that I
might haul it out someday. Then, I look at it and realize how bad
my ANSIs were. :)
What is interesting is that I have a backup of my Fido message
bases from 1996 in there. Busy place, it was.
deon wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
What is interesting is that I have a backup of my Fido message bases from 1996 in there. Busy place, it was.
Would that backup by chance of echomail for 1993/1994?
Sysop: | Chris Crash |
---|---|
Location: | Huntington Beach, CA. |
Users: | 578 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 30:03:14 |
Calls: | 10,736 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 5 |
Messages: | 443,212 |
Posted today: | 1 |